"Frank Kameny, a hero to the homosexual community who was integral in pressuring the American Psychiatric Association to reclassify same-sex activities as 'normal,' has written to a pro-family organization that he believes bestiality is fine, 'as long as the animal doesn't mind.'
In a weekend letter to Americans for Truth, an organization dedicated to revealing the truth about homosexuality, Kameny also said there is no such thing as 'sexual perversion.'
'Absolutely indisputably a central part of the very definition of Americanism is the guarantee, found in the Declaration of Independence, as not merely a Right, but as an Inalienable Right, of the 'Pursuit of Happiness,'' he wrote. 'If something which someone arbitrarily defines as a 'sexual perversion' provides happiness for consenting adult participants, then its enjoyment is enshrined in basic Americanism.
'So: Let us have more and better enjoyment of more and better sexual perversions, by whatever definition, by more and more consenting adults. We will all be the better off thereby. And that will be Americanism in action,' he said."So err, how do we know the animal has consented???
****
Resumiendo: el activista homosexual Frank Kameny ha dicho que "el bestialismo (es decir, el mantener relaciones sexuales con animales) está bien si al animal no le importa". Se basa según él, en que "en la Constitución de EEUU se encuentra con un Derecho inalienable de cada individuo, no sólo un principio, el Derecho a buscar la felicidad. Si algo que normalmente se considera como una "perversión sexual" se practica entre adultos que consienten, ese disfrute está protegido por la Constitución".
Me parece perfecto lo que dice de los adultos que consienten... Ahora bien, ¿un animal es un "adulto que consiente"? ¿Cómo manifiesta un animal ese consentimiento de alguna forma que jurídicamente sea aceptable? Porque si no consiente, sería violación...
Paren el mundo que ahora ya sí que me bajo....
Logging you in...
Entradas
